60th percentile · Notable tone variation between cheek zones
Skin Laxity / Ptosis63/100
48th percentile · Mild laxity index 1.4 · Early jowl line visible on lateral view
Clinical Insights
Key Findings
Clinician-ready observations derived from multi-angle analysis
Strong Vascular Reserve
Erythema Index of 1.87 and perfusion mapping indicate excellent healing potential — a positive indicator for ablative procedures and injectable treatments.
Periorbital Hyperpigmentation
8.2% hyperpigmented coverage concentrated around orbital region. Pre-treatment depigmentation protocol recommended before laser or peel procedures.
T-Zone Texture Irregularity
Ra 28μm roughness score and elevated pore density in nasal/forehead zones. Responds well to fractional resurfacing; recommend VISIA-confirmed mapping pre-treatment.
Mild Skin Laxity (Sagginess) Detected
Laxity Index 1.4 with early ptosis visible along jawline on lateral views. Collagen density reduction consistent with early photoaging. Recommend tensor threads or HIFU assessment before surgical planning.
Lesion Alert — 3 Nevi Flagged for Review
3 pigmented nevi identified: 2 on left cheek (3–5mm), 1 perinasal. No acute inflammation markers. No ulceration detected. Dermatologist review recommended prior to any ablative procedure.
Lesion Mapping
Skin Lesion Assessment
AI-detected lesions flagged for clinician review · Not a dermatologic diagnosis
Nevi (Moles) — 3 detected
Left cheek ×2 (3–5mm), perinasal ×1. Regular borders. Dermatologist review advised before ablative procedures.
Review
Inflammation (Erythema) — Mild
Erythema Index 1.87 within normal range. No active inflammatory lesions detected. No papules or pustules identified.
Clear
Ulcers / Open Wounds — None
No ulcerations, erosions, or open wound markers detected across all 4 photo angles. Skin barrier appears intact.
Clear
Stretch Marks (Striae) — Grade 1
Minimal striae distensae detected on neck lateral. Grade 1 (faint, superficial). Not a contraindication for planned procedures.
Grade 1
Treatment Compatibility
Procedure Match Scores
Based on Fitzpatrick III profile, ITA° +42°, and domain analysis
Chemical Peel
94% match
Laser Resurfacing
88% match
Hyaluronic Fillers
91% match
Microneedling RF
76% match
IPL / Photorejuv.
71% match
Ablative CO₂
54% match
Aging Trajectory
Skin Age vs. Chronological Age
Your skin presents 4 years younger than your peers at age 34
Age 20Age 34 ←YouAge 50
Your trajectory
Average peer
Three clinics matched to your profile
JetPatient has identified top-rated clinics compatible with your Fitzpatrick III profile and treatment interests — including SURA network providers.
SURA Partner Network
Your Matched Clinics
three listed clinics matched to your JetVision report · Fitzpatrick III · Skin Resurfacing interest
97%
Avg Compat.
4.9★
Avg Rating
3
Cities
Clínica Las Américas
Medellín, Colombia · SURA Certified
98%
Match
Skin Resurfacing
Laser
Fitzpatrick III–IV
4.9★
Why you matched
VISIA Complexion Analysis on-site. Specialist in periorbital hyperpigmentation — directly addresses your key finding. 200+ procedures for Fitzpatrick III patients in 2025.
Hospital Bupa Santiago
Santiago, Chile · SURA Network
94%
Match
Chemical Peel
Fillers
English Spoken
4.8★
Why you matched
94% chemical peel compatibility aligns with their signature TCA peel protocol for Fitzpatrick III. Bilingual team, international patient coordinator included.
Instituto de Piel CABA
Buenos Aires, Argentina
89%
Match
Microneedling RF
Texture Tx
4.7★
Why you matched
Specialist in T-zone texture irregularity with fractional RF microneedling. 76% match score for your specific Ra 28μm roughness profile. Dermatologist-led team.
SURA Anchor Partnership
Full Care Coordination via JetPatient
We don't just match you — we handle everything from intake to outcomes.
Vetted clinic & surgeon verification
Pre-op intake, travel & accommodation
Real-time care messaging & AI scribe
Post-op outcomes tracking & follow-up
JetPatient · Currently raising $3–3.5M Seed Anchor: SURA · $1M angel committed
A 30-second guided video. AI builds a 3D mesh. Surgeons tune realistic outcome ranges — calibrated to the clinic's actual historical results, not idealized renders. The simulation file becomes part of the consent record.
A 30-second guided video, captured with the patient's phone. Built on the same JetVision capture pipeline as the skin scan, extended with photogrammetric mesh reconstruction.
Honest by design. Renders show ranges, not a single hero result. Each clinic's calibration draws on its own historical outcomes, including revisions and dissatisfied cases. The simulation file is signed and attached to the consent record — the patient knows exactly what was promised, and what wasn't.