The numbers behind the network.

30-Day Complication Rate
1.9%
↓ 38% vs. U.S. benchmark
Weighted across orthopedic, bariatric, dental, and cosmetic cohorts
30-Day Readmission
1.1%
↓ 52% vs. CMS Medicare avg
Includes unplanned returns to any receiving or home facility
Patient Satisfaction (NPS)
78
Top-decile among U.S. surgical centers
n = 2,810 post-op survey responses this quarter
Avg. U.S. Savings
62%
All-in, vs. U.S. list price
Includes travel, lodging, and recovery bundle
Credentials verified per facility
100%
Re-audited annually
Additional ISO 9001 or ACHC-I at 86% of sites
Q1 2026 · Published Apr 15, 2026 Next update Jul 15, 2026 Methodology v3.2 Audited by Guardian outcomes engine
ⓘ About these numbers — Illustrative figures for this demonstration environment. Production data in the live Quality Report is derived from partner-clinic reporting, the JetPatient Care Graph, and post-op outcome follow-ups, and is audited by Guardian (our credentialing & outcomes engine) before each quarterly release. Read full methodology ›
By procedure category

Outcomes broken out by what you’re actually getting.

Blended network averages, weighted by case volume. Each category benchmarks against the most recent U.S. comparator set we could defend: CMS Medicare for inpatient procedures, Leapfrog for safety events, ADA/AAID for dental implants, ASPS for plastic surgery.

🦵

Orthopedic

Knee, hip, ACL, shoulder · n = 482 cases
30-day Complication
2.3%
vs. 3.5% CMS avg
Readmission
1.4%
vs. 4.2% CMS avg
Infection
0.6%
vs. 1.1% Leapfrog
PROMs Delta (KOOS)
+34 pts
Baseline → 90 days
What we still watch: Graft-site pain in ACL cohort (reported by 11% at 30-day post-op) drove us to add a post-op video physio check-in at day 14.
🍎

Bariatric

Sleeve, bypass, revision · n = 356 cases
30-day Complication
1.8%
vs. 4.3% ASMBS
Leak Rate
0.3%
vs. 0.9% ASMBS
90-day Mortality
0.0%
0 events in cohort
12-month EWL
68%
Within published norms
What we still watch: Adherence to post-op micronutrient protocol drops below 70% by month 6 — a handback gap we’re closing via U.S.-side PCP integration (coming Q3 2026).
🦷

Dental Implantology

All-on-4/6, full-mouth, single · n = 1,164 cases
12-mo Implant Survival
98.1%
vs. 96–98% ADA avg
Prosthesis Fracture
0.9%
Monitoring; target <0.7%
Peri-implantitis (5yr)
3.2%
vs. 9–15% published
NPS
82
Category-leading
What we still watch: Late-stage zirconia fracture is the main driver of our low-end satisfaction bucket — we adjusted material sourcing standards this quarter.

Cosmetic / Plastic

Rhinoplasty, BA, facelift, abdominoplasty · n = 584
Major Complications
1.1%
vs. 2.5% ASPS avg
Revision Rate (1yr)
4.8%
vs. 5–10% published
VTE Events
0.2%
Caprini-scored protocol
NPS
74
Above industry
What we still watch: We exclude bundled multi-procedure cosmetic cases from the leaderboard because complication scaling makes cross-clinic comparison unreliable.

JetPatient vs. the benchmark you’d defend

JetPatient network Published benchmark Lower is better unless noted ↑
Per-clinic transparency

Every partner clinic, graded.

159 partner facilities across Mexico, Colombia, Turkey, Costa Rica, Thailand, and Panama. Each clinic earns a composite Quality Score (0–100) weighting complication rate (35%), PROMs/NPS (25%), credentialing depth (20%), data-reporting completeness (10%), and incident responsiveness (10%). Scores refresh quarterly. Clinics that drop below 72 for two consecutive quarters are paused from new case intake pending a Guardian review.

Clinic Specialty Cases (Q1) Complications NPS Accreditation Score

Clinic names, cities, specialties and accreditations are real and verified; the outcome figures (cases, complications, NPS, score) are illustrative demonstration data and do not represent actual performance of any named facility. Click any column header to sort. Production Quality Report links to the full Guardian outcomes record for each clinic.

Accredited, benchmarked, and independently sourced
Per facilityCredentials verified & explained ISO 9001Quality management (non-clinical) CMSMedicare benchmarks LeapfrogSafety-grade comparator MBSAQIPBariatric registry ASPS TOPSPlastic-surgery outcomes HIPAABAA in place

“This is the first medical-travel outcomes disclosure I’ve been able to put in front of our plan committee without rewriting it. The n-counts, the benchmark sources, and the paused-clinic list are exactly what fiduciary review needs.”

Diane Keller, JD ERISA counsel · regional self-funded employer coalition
For self-funded employers & fiduciaries

Fiduciary-grade transparency, built in.

If you’re a self-funded plan sponsor under ERISA, you owe your plan participants prudent, loyal, and documented decisions about the vendors you route care through. JetPatient’s Quality Report is designed to be the artifact you attach to those decisions.

  • Quarterly outcomes package with methodology, n-counts, and benchmark sources — exportable as PDF for plan committee minutes.
  • Per-clinic composite scores, audit logs, and credential evidence available via the Employer Portal.
  • AKS / CPOM / No-Surprises framing documented by category, with plan counsel templates on request.
  • Cost transparency aligned to CAA hospital-price-transparency and RxDC intent — rather than just marketing “up to 80% savings” headlines.
Get the employer packet

Quarterly outcomes, board-ready.

Includes the quarterly Quality Report PDF, per-clinic scorecards, the full methodology memo, and an ERISA-ready fiduciary one-pager — formatted to attach straight to plan-committee minutes.

Request the employer packet ›
What’s in the fiduciary file

Every artifact your committee needs — and where it lives.

Under CAA Section 202, self-funded plan sponsors must demonstrate ongoing, documented vendor oversight. Each item below is generated as your program runs and ships inside the quarterly employer packet.

ERISA fiduciary committee log

Quarterly review record your committee signs and attaches to plan minutes.

Quality Report PDF

Per-clinic composite scorecards

Score, complication, NPS, accreditation and n-counts for every active and paused clinic.

Employer Portal + CSV

Methodology & benchmark source memo

How each metric is computed, what’s excluded, and the comparator behind every figure.

Methodology memo

AKS / CPOM / No-Surprises framing

Compliance posture documented by category, with plan-counsel templates on request.

Fiduciary one-pager

Credentialing & accreditation evidence

Licence and accreditation certificates verified per facility against the issuing register; ISO 9001 recorded separately as non-clinical quality management.

Employer Portal

Cost-transparency alignment

Bundled package pricing mapped to CAA hospital-price-transparency and RxDC intent.

Quality Report PDF

Audit log & incident responsiveness

Timestamped record of reportable events and remediation, including any clinic pauses.

Employer Portal

HIPAA BAA & data-handling

Executed business-associate agreement and de-identification protocol for all shared data.

Onboarding packet
Methodology

How we measure, what we exclude, where we get it wrong.

What we count

Every JetPatient-coordinated case at a partner clinic, tagged to the patient’s Care Graph record, with structured follow-up at day 7, day 30, and day 90 post-procedure. Post-op reporting completeness for this quarter: 94.1%.

Where data comes from

Partner-clinic EHR extracts via our FHIR bridge, patient-reported outcomes (KOOS, HOOS, BMI trajectory, ICHOM-aligned PROMs), NPS surveys, and JetPatient care coordinator case notes. De-identified and aggregated before publication.

Comparator benchmarks

CMS Medicare hospital-level outcomes (ortho), ASMBS MBSAQIP (bariatric), ADA/AAID implant registries (dental), ASPS TOPS (cosmetic), Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade, and peer-reviewed literature. Sources cited on each card; full source memo available on request.

What we exclude & caveats

Patients lost to follow-up beyond day 30 are reported separately, not dropped from the denominator. Elective same-day procedures with incomplete post-op contact are flagged but counted. We publish clinics we’ve paused alongside active ones — quiet suspensions defeat the point of a transparency report.

How to read this report

Plain-language answers to the questions buyers actually ask.

The methodology above is the technical version. Here’s the same thing in the language a benefits lead, broker, or patient would use.

How is the composite Quality Score calculated?+
Each clinic’s 0–100 score weights five inputs: complication rate (35%), PROMs/NPS (25%), credentialing depth (20%), data-reporting completeness (10%), and incident responsiveness (10%). It refreshes every quarter. A clinic below 72 for two consecutive quarters is paused from new intake.
What does the “n =” count mean?+
The n-count is the number of completed cases behind a figure for the quarter. We publish it on every metric so you can judge statistical weight — a 0% complication rate on n = 12 is not the same claim as on n = 482, and we never hide the denominator.
Why do you publish clinics you’ve paused?+
Because a transparency report that quietly drops underperformers isn’t transparent. Paused clinics stay listed with the reason and date so the record is honest and your fiduciary review can see the full picture. Toggle “Show paused clinics” in the scorecard table to view them.
What happens to patients lost to follow-up?+
They’re reported separately, not dropped from the denominator. Removing hard-to-reach patients would artificially improve every rate, so we keep them in and disclose the follow-up completeness figure (94.1% this quarter) instead.
Where do the benchmarks come from?+
Each category is compared to the most defensible public comparator: CMS Medicare (ortho), ASMBS / MBSAQIP (bariatric), ADA/AAID registries (dental), ASPS TOPS (cosmetic), and Leapfrog for safety events. Every figure cites its source, and the full source memo ships in the packet.
Is this the same data employers and brokers see?+
Yes. The public page is the summary; the employer packet adds per-clinic scorecards, the methodology memo, audit logs, and an ERISA-ready one-pager. Plan counsel and broker consultants can also request the de-identified case-level CSV.
Take it to your committee

Download the Q1 2026 packet.

The same numbers on this page, formatted to attach straight to plan-committee minutes — plus the per-clinic detail and source memo behind them.

  • Quality Report PDF with methodology & benchmark sources
  • Per-clinic scorecards & ERISA fiduciary one-pager
  • De-identified case-level CSV for plan counsel & researchers

Get instant access

Business email required. We’ll send the packet and may follow up once — no list-selling. See our privacy policy.

On its way.

We’re sending the packet to your inbox now. It usually lands within a minute.

Explore the Employer Portal ›